RESUMO
This special issue considers the relationship of the life sciences to both public policy and public administration. This makes sense because the bureaucratic process and public administration are deeply involved in the policy process and the development of substantive public policy. The two subjects are intertwined. And a biological perspective can illuminate many aspects of both. That is the focus of this issue.
Assuntos
Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas/organização & administração , Formulação de Políticas , Política , Política Pública , Humanos , Saúde PúblicaAssuntos
Biologia/história , Política , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Recent longitudinal research investigating historic shifts in attitudes toward mental health services reveal a positive cohort shift. Most likely, this shift equates to greater use of mental health services. The purpose of this study was to examine historic shifts in the use of mental health services in a rural population. In 1987, we administered a survey to 358 randomly selected rural individuals investigating their willingness to use mental health services. In 1994, we resurveyed 110 individuals from our original sample. As predicted, we found that there was a shift in our participants' willingness to use mental health services, increasing from 5% to 18%. This increased use, although improved, still fell somewhat below the actual need for mental health services, which had remained constant (about 25%). Interestingly, there was no greater reliance on psychotropic medication in lieu of psychotherapy (about 10%). In 1987, we found that those rural elderly who had the greatest need for mental health services were the least likely to use them. This trend may be shifting as well, although it requires further investigation and confirmation. The salient implications for the design and implementation of rural mental health services for baby boomers are noted.